Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: New livechat conversations are not assigned to contact manager #34210

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

matheusbsilva137
Copy link
Member

@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 commented Dec 18, 2024

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

  • Consider the contactManager property stored in contacts when deciding the default new agent to assign to a livechat room (instead of only considering the contactManager field in visitors, which is not maintained anymore).

Issue(s)

Steps to test or reproduce

In a Premium workspace, enable the "Assign new conversations to the contact manager" setting under Settings > Omnichannel > Routing. Then create a new contact manually (in the livechat contact center) using a livechat agent and assign yourself user as the contact manager (use the contacts.get endpoint to make sure the contactManager field contains the user id of the agent who created the contact). Then start a new livechat conversation using the info from the contact that has just been created.
Expected result: the contact manager should be automatically assigned to the room if it is online.

Note: use "Auto Selection" as the "Omnichannel Routing Method" (under Settings > Omnichannel > Routing). Otherwise, only bot contact managers will be auto assigned to rooms.

Further comments

CORE-862

@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 added this to the 7.2.0 milestone Dec 18, 2024
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 02d5ef5

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 35 packages
Name Type
@rocket.chat/meteor Patch
@rocket.chat/model-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/apps Patch
@rocket.chat/models Patch
@rocket.chat/account-service Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services Patch
rocketchat-services Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services Patch
@rocket.chat/cron Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status Patch
@rocket.chat/presence Patch
@rocket.chat/network-broker Patch
@rocket.chat/core-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings Patch
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client Patch
@rocket.chat/freeswitch Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit Patch
@rocket.chat/gazzodown Patch
@rocket.chat/livechat Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts Patch
@rocket.chat/license Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-client Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-voip Patch
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

  • This PR is targeting the wrong base branch. It should target 7.3.0, but it targets 7.2.0

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 18, 2024

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
🚀 Deployed preview to https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-34210/
on branch gh-pages at 2024-12-23 13:33 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.27%. Comparing base (53c81bb) to head (c555947).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop   #34210       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    59.28%   75.27%   +15.99%     
============================================
  Files         2820      516     -2304     
  Lines        67932    22540    -45392     
  Branches     15102     5485     -9617     
============================================
- Hits         40275    16968    -23307     
+ Misses       24831     4911    -19920     
+ Partials      2826      661     -2165     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e ?
e2e-api ?
unit 75.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Copy link
Contributor

@KevLehman KevLehman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests? :please:

@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 marked this pull request as ready for review December 20, 2024 05:26
@matheusbsilva137 matheusbsilva137 requested review from a team as code owners December 20, 2024 05:26
@scuciatto scuciatto added the stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider label Dec 20, 2024
@dionisio-bot dionisio-bot bot added the stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge label Dec 20, 2024
@MarcosSpessatto MarcosSpessatto modified the milestones: 7.2.0, 7.3.0 Dec 23, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit b4ce579 into develop Dec 23, 2024
49 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/contact-manager-auto-assign branch December 23, 2024 15:28
@matheusbsilva137
Copy link
Member Author

/patch

Copy link
Contributor

dionisio-bot bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Pull request #34492 added to Project: "Patch 7.1.1"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stat: QA assured Means it has been tested and approved by a company insider stat: ready to merge PR tested and approved waiting for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants